Why the “virgin” trope is the worst trope in Romance

Why the “virgin” trope is the worst trope in Romance

The “virgin” trope is the worst trope in the Romance book genre. (In my humble and correct opinion.) The first season of Netflix’s BRIDGERTON (and the associated book) embody this in all its horrid glory.

This trope has its origins in the Romance genre (mainly the Historical subgenre, but I have seen others use it) and it needs to die a quick but hopefully painful death.

STOP FETISHIZING VIRGINS, DAMN IT.

This trope is where the story focuses on a woman’s “innocence” and the plot follows her learning about sex from a typically much more experienced and significantly older man (a la FIFTY SHADES OF GREY). It revolves around the idea that the heroine is more desirable to her love interest for her lack of conquests (while usually showing the opposite for her male counterpart).

To be clear, there is no problem authors writing virgin heroines just as there is no problem with being a virgin. One’s sexual experience or lack thereof should not decide a person’s identity.

The problem is when a person’s sexual experience or the lack thereof becomes their primary character trait and the way they are defined for the whole dang story.

It is misogyny at its peak.

Romance writers (like the writers and producers of BRIDGERTON) are primarily female, so we can’t even blame this trope on the men. But we don’t need to. Women have been quite well trained to enforce our own oppression.

I grew up in a very conservative religious environment and I heard from older women all the time about how having sex before marriage would “destroy” me. (I’m not even exaggerating. One woman used those exact words.)

We were on the heels of the Purity Movement and if you don’t know what that is, consider yourself spared. It started out as a noble endeavor, but got out of hand and ending up hurting many, many people.

Well into my twenties, older women were concerned with whether I’d had sex, was currently having it, or was planning to have it outside marriage. While this was kind of creepy and definitely none of their business, it does get worse.

I hate how older women have been obsessed with my sex life, but I just as much hate the shame and guilt I have seen other women in the church experience. So many of these women feel they are worthless because they think what made them desirable is gone.

Some of these women made choices in their younger years they regret. Some are divorcees and see themselves as used goods. Many have even been sexually abused as children.

(And don’t get me started on the women who still are virgins thinking they’re better than those who aren’t. Yes, it IS a thing, and yes, it IS dumb.)

In these situations, I see the ideas and mindset behind the virgin trope played out in all their harmful culmination. A woman is not a condom. She doesn’t become trash after intercourse.

You can argue that the trope is not directly correlated to this idea, but I have seen firsthand how it feeds into that incredibly damaging mindset.

That’s why I won’t let the virgin trope slide as harmless entertainment. It hurts women and I’m not going to forgive this one.

Writers can have virgin heroines all they want, but they need to stop fetishizing virginity and stop making it a plot device.

Thanks for letting me get this off my chest.

If you have any thoughts to add, to agree or even disagree, feel free to leave a comment and let’s talk!

Back to blog

5 comments

Well, you do have a point, that virginity shouldn’t be a woman’s most important trait. That’s, I mean, that’s obvious. In history, though, it very much, was relevant and can’t be erased. In fantasy, even historical fantasy, I’m completely on your side. That’s the place, where we, the writers and readers, can build a better world, or worse for that matter.
I’m doomed to write fanfictions for the rest of my life, since I lack the imagination to come off with something completely of my own. (my fanfics tend to be over 100 word pages long so … )
But I also have virgin characters, women, but their virginity is maybe talked about once, but never part of being chosen because of it. (why am I unable to write short comments … )

Yvonne

Misogyny doesn’t mean men hating women. The heat can come from other women, even if it’s accidental or not intentional. This is very much a misogynistic practice. And it does need to stop.

Fred

Is it odd that the first case of this trope that I think of is actually Jamie Fraser the virgin bridegroom and his moderately more experienced if also more reluctant bride in the first Outlander book?

Nicola

Yes, THIS. The virginity trope is both tired and one dimensional, and “wokeness” aside, it absolutely contributes the commodification of women. While of course historically it was common for women to be traded like commodities, it needs to stop impacting the value. If you look hard enough there is the odd historical romance that follows a widow that makes a good marriage and finds love despite no longer being “innocent” the lion’s share do put way too much emphasis on virginity as a character trait.

Nicole

You lost me the second this turned woke and spewed that crap. I love historical romances and while I agree that virgin tropes aren’t the best because most make it cringe. I am disgusted that you and most jump right on the misogyny train like a bad rerun. The shark’s been jumped enough times.

Jessie

Leave a comment